Archive for August 14th, 2008

Don’t Shoot The Messenger!

I think I’ve been very clear over the years about unexplained information in medical records and how life insurance underwriters deal with it. They ask questions!

Sometimes the mystery information isn’t relevant once it is explained. Sometimes the information doesn’t even pertain to the patient. I think I’ve shared this before, but several years ago a client was declined after a review of medical records due to not admitting a history of heart disease.

After calling the client with the news, she was adamant that she had never had any kind of cardiac event and had never consulted a doctor for any potentially cardiac related symptoms. After speaking to the underwriter, he said that the records clearly mentioned the word angioplasty. He gave me the page number and said the word was circled. I passed this on to the client who pursued a review of her medical records. She and her doctor were finally able to nail down the reason for the note. It seems she had a friend who was going to undergo an angioplasty and she had asked the doctor to explain what it was. As he explained, he doodled and subsequently left the word angioplasty in the records of someone who didn’t even know what it was.

Doctors are notorious for doodling or writing down some thought with no further explanation. And generally I become the messenger, being shot on sight because the underwriter is asking for clarification. It means homework for the potential insured and while some don’t mind, most feel as though they are being asked to do the work that someone else should do.

This came to a head with one client the other day when I called and asked if she could get a letter from her doctor explaining why he had circled a certain condition on two separate visits, something not done on any other visits. Without clarification the company was willing to offer coverage at a higher rate than originally quoted. With an explanation we could likely have had a policy issued at the same rates originally quoted. She refused. She said it was obvious to her and if it wasn’t obvious to the insurance company, then they were just trying to gouge her for additional premium. The circled condition with no explanation needed clarification. She shot the messenger and withdrew her application.

Bottom line. Underwriters have to try to make sense of your medical records. If you think that’s easy, you’ve either never been sick or never looked in your medical records. If an agent comes back to you asking for clarification, it’s not because the insurance company wants to raise the premium, but rather because they are looking for an explanation that would help them avoid that.

Add comment August 14th, 2008

Return Of Premium Term Insurance Weighted In Favor Of Company!

The question of return of premium term insurance has been viewed from a lot of angles in this forum, but today I think we need to switch our focus from the end of the term to the midpoint. There is, I believe, an assumption out there that a return of premium policy will return the premiums paid in no matter when you cancel it.

This assumption falls right into the same trap as most life insurance, the industry secret for why life insurance rates are so low. The reason rates are so low and the reason you need to truly think through the purchase of ROP term is that most life insurance policies don’t stay in force. Think about it. If all life insurance policies stayed in force, whether term to the end of the term (or converted), universal life or whole life, rates would have to go up to cover the increased company exposure to mortality.

The truth is that for a large percentage of life insurance purchasers, the whole idea kind of loses its’ luster when you’ve been paying for 5 or 10 years and nothing is happening. Especially for those who are still in great health, there is a tendency to start questioning the expense. My personal opinion is that those who fall into that mindset are selfish and need to simply get a grip (again), on why the life insurance is there and that the right thing to do is to stay insured.

Back to the ROP though. I was speaking a person today who was considering decreasing the amount of coverage they need in order to afford the extra expense of a return of premium. Their thought was to convert the policy in 15 years, halfway into the 30 year ROP and use the returned premium to help fund the conversion.

Life insurance companies build their products, prices and business models knowing that most people will cancel their life insurance before the end. I pointed out that in the early stages of the ROP term policy most companies don’t offer any return. It usually starts building slowly after the 6th year and usually doesn’t reach even 50% until the 25th year of a 30 year term. I think this illustration, return-of-premium-illustrated, will drive home what I’m talking about.

Bottom line. The only way to get 100% of your premiums returned is to keep the policy to the end. Considering the tax free status of the return, if you know you will keep it until you die or to the end of the term, the return can be ok especially given today’s economy. If you’re not sure, steer clear.

1 comment August 14th, 2008


Calendar

August 2008
S M T W T F S
« Jul   Sep »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Posts by Month

Posts by Category