I’ve Got AARP On My Mind Again, And I’m Not Thinking Nice Thoughts!
February 19th, 2009
There’s something about one of those weeks when I get 10 pieces of mail from AARP touting all of their worn out, rip off products that just makes me want to talk about it. Since my Mom doesn’t care and my wife doesn’t want to hear it again, thanks for listening.
AARP in partnership with New York Life provides some of the worst life insurance products available in the United States today. It is safe to say that neither of these entities should be asking for any kind of bailout since they should be doing quite well from their pillaging of our nation’s elderly.
They offer 5 year term insurance. What that means is that the price goes up at ages 55, 60, 65 and so on. Using myself as an example at age 55, I can get $50,000 of insurance for $74.58 per month. At age 60 the price will go up to $108.25 per month, age 65 up to $143.96 per month, age 70 up to $207.25 per month, age 75 onward and upward to, well, they can’t even tell you. And none of that is even guaranteed. If AARP/NYL decide the cow isn’t fat enough they have the option to raise rates on everyone at any point. So, they have an overpriced product that becomes more overpriced every five years, it ends at age 80 (about the average mortality today), and they can’t even guarantee the rates will stay as bad as they are.
So, let’s compare AARP to real life. Using me as an example and making myself is kind of poor health I can buy $50,000 of permanent insurance, a universal life no lapse guarantee, with a guaranteed level premium (forever) for $78.14 a month through West Coast Life. So, let’s say I live to age 80. I will have paid in $23,442 and my policy will policy will stay in force for as long as I need it by continuing to pay $78.14 per month.
If on the other hand I take a stupid pill and buy AARP’s plan, we know that by age 75 I will have paid $32,041. Since we don’t know what the prices are when it renews at 75, assuming they stay the same as the age change at 70 (bad assumption by the way), I will have paid $44,476 into my $50,000 policy. If I’m still kicking and still need insurance and am stupid enough to get from AARP at age 80 I can convert my pathetic term policy to their pathetic whole life insurance for $462.58 a month. So, well before my 82nd birthday I will have paid more than my death benefit to New York Life and if I die they don’t give me the larger of the two numbers. And they don’t even guarantee that the $462.58 will stay level. The price could still go up.
And just to frost this inedible cake, just suppose you came to your senses and at age 80 you decide AARP stinks and you buy a guaranteed level premium (forever) life insurance policy from West Coast Life. Price? $329 a month. Not $462 non guaranteed. $329 fully guaranteed. By the way, if I had stuck with the original West Coast Life at $78.12 even at age 100 I would not have paid my own death benefit. If you stuck with New York Life and they didn’t have any rate increases you would have paid $154,800 on your $50,000 policy and the most your family would ever see from it is $50,000.
Bottom line. Saying “shame on you AARP and New York Life” just doesn’t seem quite adequate.
These guys suck and rip off old people like me, and my my Mom. They should have to stop and repay everyone.
- Is Burial Insurance A Good Idea?
- AARP Is Not Your Friend!!
- A Company That Sucks And Doesn’t Suck!
- Bankers Life Of New York Hits The Ground Running With Indexed Universal Life!
- AARP Speaks Out Against Companies That Do What AARP Does!
Entry Filed under: AARP, conversion, insurance, life insurance, term insurance, universal life, whole life
7 Comments Add your own
1. Michael @ The Life Insurance Insider | February 20th, 2009 at 8:59 pm
And to think AARP was originally established to benefit it’s members and help retirees get competitive health insurance rates.
I guess some life insurance is better than nothing. If AARP motivates them to buy when nobody else would, I would think they are better off. It does seem like AARP would serve itself better by taking a lower commission from NYLife or another company and giving their members a competitive product.
2. Ed Hinerman On Life Insur&hellip | February 26th, 2009 at 10:27 pm
[...] did a comparison the other day between a $50,000 policy through AARP and a $50,000 policy through West Coast Life and it was [...]
3. Ed Hinerman On Life Insur&hellip | May 15th, 2009 at 7:36 pm
[...] folks that have 5 year renewable term or in some cases 10 year renewable term. I wrote a post about AARP’s term insurance products not long ago, and if you take the numbers from that I can see why it might lead you to [...]
4. P Worthy | July 17th, 2009 at 9:46 pm
Thank you Ed for this wonderful article. At a time when seniors are struggling to eat, This insurance is horrible. I have been researching rates and even though there is no medical exam, there are other companies that offer the same with lower rates. AARP should really negoiate a better deal for seniors.
5. Hinerman | July 17th, 2009 at 9:52 pm
Put up with a free exam and the picture gets much better.
6. Tom | July 31st, 2009 at 12:31 pm
AARP is simply a bunch of liberal socialist intent on making heavy profits from mediocre to terrible services/policies.
My Hartford/AARP auto insurance ($ 757. for 2 cars) just increased to $ 853. No accidents or tickets for 14 years but I’m increased.
On the web Amica ($ 672.), State Farm ($ 702) and Allstate ($627)
were all lower than my “preferred” AARP rate!.
I chose Amica for their JD Power 1st place rating 7 years in a row.
Guess AARP has profits blindsiding them from their original mission
7. Lou | September 5th, 2009 at 5:55 pm
I recently found out that my mother has been paying monthly for an life insurance policy through AARP. My sister and I will each received $5,000 at her death. She has already paid them nearly $14,000 for this $10,000 policy. If she lives another 10 years, they will have received double that. She could have been putting that money in just a pathetic savings account and had a better return. AARP is ripping off their members and should be ashamed.
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed