Return of Premium term insurance. A perfect fit!

March 2nd, 2007

Life insurance on a good day is considered by many to be a necessary evil. On a bad day, just a waste of money. Consider the following on a young couple that had just received a quote for term insurance from, of all sources, an AFLAC agent. The wife and husband were quoted a whopping $200+ per month for $200,000 of 30 year term. At her age 25 and his age 31, the odds are well in their favor that they will live longer than that. That is a lot of money. $70,000 or so over 30 years.

An independent life insurance agent could present the same couple with an option of a return of premium term insurance policy. The same couple, for $250,000, would pay $250 a year for her, $19 a month and $350 a year for him, about $30 a month. Now we have already determined they will outlive a 30 year term. With this new direction they will spend about $600 a year, making their total outlay over 30 years come to $18,000.

If that’s not good enough, at that point they get their return of premium. A tax free check for $18,000. So, at the end of 30 years they can look back at the $70,000 they spent or forward to how they are going to spend their $18,000.

I won’t even go into what AFLAC wanted to sell them for children’s life insurance except to say that it was an equally bad deal. Kind of makes me dislike ducks…………….

Related Posts

Entry Filed under: Independent agent, children's life insurance, insurance, insurance quotes, life insurance, return of premium term insurance, term insurance

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Brent  |  November 8th, 2008 at 11:19 pm

    not sure where you got your rates for Aflac products but using the info you gave for a 25 and 31 even for tobacco rates its $122/month and that’s adding the accidental death rider that doubles it in the event of an accidental death. its $60/month for non tobbacco rates … I’m not saying Aflac is the best choice for life for most people but what you have to keep in mind is that its a simplified underwriting product. There are no tests involved only a few underwriting questions. Its yes or no based on the app so obviously rates will be higher for such a product.

  • 2. Hinerman  |  November 10th, 2008 at 1:20 pm

    Ok, whatever. Why would a healthy person accept a higher rate that they will be paying for many years just because it is slightly easier. At that age paying $122 a month is just as stupid as watching a commercial about a duck.

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Calendar

March 2007
S M T W T F S
« Feb   Apr »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Recent Posts